AI and ethics

How law firms are using AI, and what ethics opinions say

Law firms use AI for intake, research, drafting, summaries and marketing. ABA Formal Opinion 512 (July 2024) says lawyers need a reasonable understanding of the tools, must verify output, protect client information, communicate where needed, bill fairly and supervise the work. AI is a tool for a lawyer, not a lawyer.

Key takeaways

  • Law firms use AI for intake, research support, drafting, summaries and marketing.
  • ABA Formal Opinion 512 applies existing Model Rules to generative AI. It is not binding, and states can differ.
  • The lawyer stays responsible for accuracy, confidentiality and supervision.
  • A chatbot is not a lawyer, and should not give legal advice on a firm’s behalf.

How are law firms using AI?

  • Intake and lead response: answering or calling new enquiries, gathering basic facts, booking consults.
  • Research support: finding and summarizing sources, which a lawyer must check.
  • Drafting: first versions of letters, summaries and marketing copy.
  • Document review: sorting and summarizing records.
  • Marketing: writing and testing ad wording, within advertising rules.

What does ABA Formal Opinion 512 say?

The American Bar Association issued Formal Opinion 512 on July 29, 2024, its first ethics opinion on generative AI. Summaries say it applies existing Model Rules rather than creating new ones:

DutyWhat the summaries say
Competence (Rule 1.1)Lawyers need a reasonable understanding of the tools, not expert knowledge, and should not rely on output without independent review
Confidentiality (Rule 1.6)Protect client information when using AI tools; understand where data goes
Communication (Rule 1.4)Tell clients about AI use where it matters to the representation
Candor to courtsCheck AI-assisted filings; the lawyer answers for their accuracy
Supervision (Rules 5.1 and 5.3)Supervise staff and vendors who use or provide AI tools
Fees (Rule 1.5)Bill fairly; do not bill for more time than was spent

The opinion is guidance, not binding on any court or disciplinary body. Your state’s bar may have its own opinion, so look for it.

Can ChatGPT act as a lawyer?

No. A general chatbot is not licensed to practise law and can state wrong answers with confidence. Rules against the unauthorized practice of law and against misleading communications are why an AI intake assistant should collect facts and hand off to a person, not advise. SouthSeas Marketing’s assistant is built that way: it gathers basic details and the best callback time, and your team takes it from there.

What should a firm do before it adopts an AI tool?

  1. Decide the task and who reviews the output.
  2. Ask where data is stored, who can read it and whether it trains the vendor’s models.
  3. Get script and wording approval from your counsel.
  4. Write a short internal policy and train staff on it.
  5. Review results on a schedule.

For how the rules apply to AI calls and lead handling, see the AI intake compliance guide.

Want this worked out for your firm? The free 20-minute growth audit looks at your ads and how new leads are handled today, and you keep the written plan. Book my free growth audit.

Questions

Common questions

Common uses include intake and lead response, summarizing documents, legal research support, drafting first versions, and marketing. A lawyer should review anything that reaches a client, a court or the public.

Ethics opinions treat AI as a tool a lawyer uses and remains responsible for. Licensed lawyers still make legal judgments and answer for the work.

No. A chatbot is not licensed, owes no duties to a person, and can be wrong. An AI tool should not give legal advice to the public on a firm’s behalf without a lawyer’s oversight.

According to summaries, it applies the Model Rules to generative AI: competence, confidentiality, communication, candor to courts, supervision and fees. It is not binding on any court or disciplinary body, and states can differ.

Sources and notes

  1. The Florida Bar News, ABA issues first ethics guidance on a lawyer’s use of AI tools — summary of ABA Formal Opinion 512, July 29, 2024
  2. LawNext, In first ethics ruling on gen AI, ABA says lawyers must have reasonable understanding of the technology — summary of ABA Formal Opinion 512

Please note. General information for law firms, not legal advice. Rules differ by state and change. Have your firm’s ethics counsel confirm what applies to you before you act.

Free growth audit

Book a 20-minute audit.

We look at how your firm’s ads and new leads are handled today. You leave with a written plan for AI-made ads and calls within minutes. Useful even if you never hire us.

  • 01 A short video call at a time that suits you
  • 02 A written plan in your inbox the same day
  • 03 No obligation and no follow-up pressure

After you send this, you will go straight to the calendar to choose a time. Privacy